Swiftgron - Blog Posts

Lover of Taylor swift❤️❤️

Taylor swift queer flagging part eight:

this will be the last part for a while. just until I find more or she debuts any new outfit!!!

People saying the tortured poets department is somehow tied to Joe because of ONE word that coincides with Joe friends groupchat , but dismissing queer analysis of Taylor lyrics based on queer history and references and parallels that Taylor has done herself is wild to me.

We are all just guessing. Is just guessing. Hetlors are speculating as much as gaylors are.

The only difference is that gaylors get harrased because of that speculation

Sooo, I just read a post saying that gaylors are disgusting because they want to force Taylor out of the closet?? And that NYT should not have posted that article???

Let me get something clear, if you are closeted, you try and hide your queernes as much as you can. You dont go around singing about your agumentative, antithetical dream girl and wearing someone like a necklace. You dont talk about hairpin drops. You dont dress yourself in the bi pride flag colors and sing about wanting boys and girls. Is not something you do if you are closeted.

Forcing someone out of the closet is disgunting, thats for sure, the thing were this person is wrong is that we are not trying to force Taylor out of the closet. Forcing her would be something she does not agree on but since she has been putting all the queercoding and queer slang in her music (out there to listen and analize by everyone) and decide to do some things queer people use to identify each other and send signals in public, aware she is being watched by the whole world, I would argue that the talking about her probably being queer is consented by her.

Also, saying she is in a closet would mean she is secretive about it and trying to pass as straight, which I think I gave you enough examples as to why she is not secretive about it. Is out there to see. And because is out there to see, it is okay to talk about it. She put it out there. The NYT only talked about queercoding in her music, which is completely fine to talk to. She wrote that music and she released it. She filmed that videos. Chose that words. She is in control and she decided to leave hairpin drops as often as she could. The NYT was not outing her or anything, it was just doing a reading of a piece of art using certain simbology, that happens to be the queer one. And if we think about how the art and the artist are connected, is fair enough to wonder if she could be attracted to woman. She hints at it in her music!

Of course Taylor Swift is straight. Is totally straight to dress up as Sappho and hide in a glass closet to sing in the MV of the first track of your really queer album where you sing "thats my man" so many times that is just campy and ridculous considering how queercoded that lyrics are. Those gaylors are just taking it too far.

Hits diferent (HD) and I dont wanna live forever (IDWLF) might as well just be the same song separated in two.

Both of them have the same themes and imaginary. Both are about a girl deeply heartbroken that tries to party away the pain of the break up and then cries when it doesnt work.

Now, being stated that, we know that the songs on the midnight album are song that Taylor write in different times of her life, and noticing the similarities between HD and IDWLF, it only makes sense to think they were written at the exact same time, about the same situation and muse.

I know that IDWLF is a song for a film, but it can still apply to Taylors life and sitution, since she has stated that she writes from a personal experience. Maybe the song was intended to fit the plot of the movie but she probably took some of her own felings and experiences and putted them into it.

Also, both of them fit the narrative of 1989. She was out and about, partying eith the girlies and all the stuff and she was also heartbroken (like she stated in the vault tracks).

Now, I am about to dive into swifgron, so if you dont like it, I suggest you to stop reading now.

Taylor posted this video:

She made sure we wached the bunny. She even looked at the screen (with 0 discrepcion, may I add) to make sure it was there. You know whos nickname was bunny, you are right, Dianna Agron.

For the propose of this theory, I will take that as a confirmation that IDWLF is about Dianna (if people can make the case for ATW being about Jake because of a scarf or all 1989 about Harry for a few pap pictures, I guess we will have no problem making the case for Dianna and IDWLF based on that video).

Then, if IDWLF is basically the same song as HD (based on the parallels of their lyrics and all the stuff I pointed before) and if IDWLF muse is Dianna Agron then we could that Hits different is about Dianna Agron.

Thats it. Thats all I have to say today.

Disclaimer: this is just my interpretation and by sharing this I am not saying this is the truth or that Taylor said that to me or something like that. I am just reading and analising the art and content she putted out there.

So, Taylor Nation just posted a photo of Taylor in her birthday with tha caption "bejeweled girl at the birthday party" with the bejewel song too. Is she soft launching a Travlor break up with the articule about Travis having doubst, then he not being at her birthday party and now the bejewel caption???

I was just listening to suburban legends and, first thing first, what and absolute total banger. I genuinely cannot understand why I did not listen to this song more often. And second, the lyrics are like, really queer-coded.

The one that really called my attention was "1950s gymnasium". Now, if you dont know that, in the 1950s the lavander scare, a process where queer people where maked to be outcast on the society by the goverment, took place. People needed to hide and did not really know who to trust (since the people caught "guilty" were force by torture and manipulation to give names or other queer people), it was really a strugle. She says she is "standing in a 1950s gymnasium" like, trying to survive the scrutiny and navigaiting her life not knowing who to trust about her true self alongside other queer people. All together in one place, practicing not getting caught (and we all now that era was when Taylor was really bad at hiding her alleged relationships with women)

Then, theres the chorus. I didnt come here to make friends, when would you need to clarify that in a straight scenario? Almost never and, based on the lyrics, I dont think thats the case. And then the "you kissed me on a way thats gonna screw me up forever" its really deep if we read it as queer. Taylor queerness was an obstacle to her career, something that should be hidden and secretive because the consecuences of it being know were too catastrofic (like in the 1950s). Her queerness could screw her career and dreams forever, so that kiss (that I think represents her whole relationship with the muse) could screw her up forever, everything she has worked for could go away because of who she was in love with. Yet, when she hold her, it hold her together, so it was worth it.

Now in the second verse, there are (appart from the 1950s lyrics) a few things that caught my attention. First, the fantasy she has about surprising everyone with their mismatched sings, its a fantasy because it cannot happen. Its not posible, that is why it is a fantasy. Second, theres the lyric, "You'd be more than a chapter in my old diaries with the pages ripped out" she says "You'd" as in a way of hoping, like saying: if our love was not something we have to hide you will be more than a than a chapter in my old diaries with the pages ripped out. Now, this thing about ripping of pages of a diary is honestly heartbreaking. She feels so afraid, she needs to hide that much that she even erased any prove of her love from her diaries, one of the most personal things anyone could ever own, were you pour your feeling to yourself and yourself only; she could not even trust her diaries to keep her love secret.

To finish, we have to tie it all to the title: suburban legends. A history that everyones knows yet no one can tell if it is or not true, because there us no proof. It could be real or not, but everyone has heard of it. Taylor saying her and her muse were born to be suburban legends insinuates that the relationships she is singing about was secret, very few people knew that it existed for real (bacause it was not safe) but everyone heard the rumors about it.

Disclaimer: this is just my interpretation and by sharing this I am not saying this is the truth or that Taylor said that to me or something like that. I am just reading and analising the art she putted out there.

I just read a re-post of one of my post from a non-gaylor, and I would like to say it was a really good, respectful answer that explained their point of view perfectly and, by any means, this post is an attemp to start beef or anything.

Being said that, one of the points that really standed out to me was how some fans would "force a queer identity on her" (not quoting them, just summarizing) and how twisting lyrics to hold a narrative or using certain interpretation of a song, was not healthy, in reference to the connection I made to the album midnights and Taylors queerness.

Now, I would like to ask, isnt twisting a lyric to fit a narrative how people started saying that Taylor was the "argumentative antithetical dream girl" she refers to in hits different, when is crearly (and is a question of grammar and basic language comprension) refering to the muse of the song?

Bet I could still melt your world, argumentative antithetical dream girl. Are you kidding me?? How could you posible say this makes sense if she was refering to herself???

Then, the paternity test constantly done by swifties to look for the muse of a song is nothing more than a certain interpretation of the lyric to fit the narrative. So that is not a thing exclusive to gaylors, almost every swiftie does it.

Now, that is what I like to call a double standard. I am not shaming the original autor of the post that have inspired this text, but pointing out a more societal problem. Very often, speculation and shipping and reading into things, if done in a hetero way is okay but do not dare to do it in a way that relates to queerness.

About the "forcing a queer identity on her", there is a thing, done through history called flagging. Safo was doing it in ancient Grecee, so did Oscar Wilde and more recently Elton John or James Dean. There are signals of the queer community to signal discretely to other lgbtq+ that they are one of them.

Taylor is not subtle about her flagging. She went out in a bi pride colored jacket to sing "and you can want who you want, boys and boys and girls and girls". She did sing about wearing someone like a necklace. She did spray paint her paint the bi colors to her gay pride music video. Use the lyric hair pin drop more than once. She puts lesbian flag colors as the main lighting in her world wide tour. And much much more. Is obvious, really out there for the people who want to see it to see.

Once you see that, you have no option but to hope she is queer; because if she was not, she would only be a straight girl that harmed the queer comunity by taking all the simbolisim that lgbtq+ people have built througt the ages and making it hetero to the mainstream, erasing the very little history the comunity has managed to create in the opressed world that it had have to endure.

So, even if I think that the answer to my previous post was really well written and respectful, I do not think it is a really nuance take.

PD: To the person behind the original blog that posted the answer, if you have read this and recognised yourself on it, just know this is not a personal attack and I apologize before hand if that felt like that to you.

Honestly, I completely understand why Taylor Swift would hide her queerness. Not only because is the safest option for her but because she is a petty queen. Imagine being told you have to hide who you are to archieve your dreams. Then you worked hard and followed the rules. You get crushed sometimes, but that is okay, because you recover and go back bigger than ever. You live your love in secret, hiding in plan sight, only for the ones that are like you to see. Then you are higher than you ever been. You are not great but the greatest.

Now you reveal your queerness. Completely out for everyone to see, there is no deniying it now, it is imposible to do so.

Imagine crushing the persona that everyone has admired. Imagine destroying the God they have created and worshipped, the one that you hated so much, just by being yourself.

What a beautiful satisfying revenge would be to change the paradigma so quikly, just by being freely and unshamedly yourself. What an amazing feeling would be to laugh at everyones face by saying: "hey, the thing you have adored all your life, she doesnt exist. I have been lying to you in order to be loved, and the people you call dumb or crazy or delusional for reading what I was saying, for seeing through my lies were right"

By the way, this is kind of the premise of mastermind and dear reader (and the midnights album as a whole). Just in case you were wondering.

So, aparently and according to Closer, Travis is having doubts about Taylor and their relationship. The articule says he still loves her but the public talking about how they may be pr and the rumour about her marriage with Joe (that is confirmed by Tree Pain to not be true) are messing with him.

The articule is very detailed, almost as if they read the mind of Kelce, and I cannot help but ask, how would they know? What I am trying to say is, this really looks like they are trying to craft a narrative around their relationships. The magazine is most likely not making that up, but been told by sources from Taylor and Travis team.

This is all really campy and reminds me of the Tom Hiddleston pre-reputation pr stunt, and it completely makes sense for them to do that.

If we take a closer look to Taylors public persona during the re recording era, she really tried and recreate her public dating life for the time of the albums original release when the re recording was going to be released. Previously to Speak Now TV she dated Matty Healy, a really cuestionable guy that swifties dont like. Pre 1989TV release she started being a lot more public with friends and starting dating Kalce out of the blue, which really draws paralels to her girlsquad and her relationship with Harry Styles or Calvin Harris, I am not really sure which one she might be recreating (and maybe Kelce is the mix of both Styles and Harris).

Now, in the pre reputation era, and if this pattern is not me reading a lot into her every move, it makes a lot of sense that Kelce has now gone from the character of Styles/Harris of 1989 to the Tom Hiddleston of reputation, all public and unashamed.

I dont know where she is going with all this public performances she is making, and maybe Travlor is a real, genuine, happy relationship (which good for her because everyone deserves true, happy, genuine love) but that is my take on it.

So, I am reading the Taylor Swift person of the year article and it was only when she signed a new record deal that she was given more creative freedom. Then the lover era started, the queerest era, when she was supposed to come out. In the exact moment she had the chance to come out safely she tried. I have been crying for about 5 minutes.

Okay, lets get something clear, she can be queer and in a loving relationship with a man. Years and years of flagging are not erased by a happy relationship with a man. She could be bisexual, pansexual, queer, unlabeled...

Genuine question, who do non-gaylors think the whole midnights album is about??

If only I could get Jack Antonoff drunk and convince him I can keep a secret I would know EVERYTHING

Gay pride makes me, me. In a straight way tho. Could you imagine me as one of those queers? What a ridiculous thought

I just saw this comment on fb. Hmmmm, I don't think TS will do that given the fact that she's highly suspicious that everyone who'll see London Boy will want him because he's got a big fucking reputation, he's so gorgeous that she can't say anything to his face, and also fit like a daydream.

she wanted to say her so badly

in case who calls??

taylor nation were so unserious

LGB.... LGBT? ..iykyk???

no straight woman is this worried about keeping a relationship secret

gaygaygaygay

taylor swift girl kisser

she was so far out of the closet at this point its crazy how some people can still deny it

if you were wearing the jeans, who was wearing that little black dress taylor...

every single day i think about this deleted tweet

since 1989 tv is coming, heres why wonderland was about dianna agron

background information: taylor swift and dianna agron are rumoured to have dated between 2011 and 2013 and there's quite a lot of evidence to support this. they were seen together in public during this time and there are songs on both red and 1989 about her.

alice in wonderland was dianna's favourite film which is referenced in the title

'we took a wrong turn and we fell down the rabbit hole' the wrong turn could be that they started out as friends and became something more, rabbit hole is another reference to alice in wonderland and dianna's tumblr url was wefelldowntherabbithole

the spinning out of control is their relationship changing from friends to dating

'didnt you flash your green eyes at me' dianna has green eyes

'curious minds' is probably talking about them experimenting with their sexualities

'didn't it all seem new and exciting' describing a new relationship dynamic and experience of dating a woman. dianna at the time had tweeted that she was grateful for 'new changes + excitement unfolding'

they found 'wonderland' and didn't realise what they were getting into, they knew the relationship couldn't last forever

'too in love to think straight' pretty self explanatory

the public were realising what was going on between the two, there were articles about it, and dianna was asked in an interview if there was anything going on between her and taylor. it must've become difficult and frustrating to hide their relationship with the public always watching.

cheshire cat is a character in alice in wonderland, another reference to her favourite film

losing their mind probably means the stress they were put under by the public creating rumours about them

'you searched the world for something else' dianna went traveling after the breakup

by going back home she may mean returning to a life without dianna

'we both went mad' dianna had a tattoo saying 'we're all mad here' however she had the tattoo removed shortly after the song was released

someone actually give me a heterosexual explaination for this necklace

do you guys think about the rainbow taylor drew 🌈 with “ME” in it and this IDENTICAL sign in the music video for ME! because i do and i just want to d word 😄 anyway