So me and my boys finished our season with a record of 4-6-0 should have been 6-4 but let's say I doubt the competency of one if the refs we had for two games. Okay so it's it's not a great record but for the past 2 years we went 1-9-0 so we're defiantly coming back. For a little backstory for myself, I play on the offensive line of my team. Not a glamorous role but a very important one. Iv been playing for only a couple of years and iv been assistant coaching for one. And I love every minute of it. Onwards no though into the winter and to the next season where I'm coaching at a British university in the bucs league. Time to make some lineman run laps!
The Order 1886: *shows a playable woman in practical clothing killing monsters in a Victorian London setting*
Bloodborne: *shows a woman and paraplegic characters surviving a post apocalyptic Victorian London setting*
Assassin's Creed Victory: *shows an able bodied white guy stabbing people in the ordinary streets of Victorian London*
------
So there's two games that have exactly what you're looking for and you're mad that another game that takes place in the same setting doesn't conform to your wishes. SJWs, everyone.
Grow up.
When someone tells me that the White men stole this land, and that we are a Nation of Immigrants.
it’s all over but the crying and nobody’s crying but me
Maggie Menu
On the menu for Maggie tonight is puréed sweet potato, puréed brown rice, sprouted organic tofu, chia seeds, and digestive enzymes. Does she look excited? She is!
“Suspects can not be sentenced for a general call to jihad, for spreading propaganda for terrorist organizations, preaching their causes or glorifying their actions, a German federal court rules.”
Source
“A 62-year-old woman was sentenced to a fine of 1,350 euro for liking a Facebook post about refugees. One of the comments read; “How do you like your refugees?” with the answer being “In the distance.”
Her Facebook was banned and her house was raided by police.
The judge deemed it ‘incitement’ [to violence/hate], and ‘not amusing’.
Source, second source.
For British citizens only.
Rape laws in the UK are sexist. As defined by the Sexual Offences Act 2003:
Section 1 makes it an offence for a person (A) intentionally to penetrate with his penis the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) without that person’s consent if A does not reasonably believe that B consents. Subsection (2) provides that whether a belief in consent is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents. This and the offence in section 5 are the only offences that can only be committed by a male, because they relate to penile penetration. Subsection (3) provides that sections 75 and 76 apply to this offence. Sections 75 and 76 deal with evidential and conclusive presumptions about consent.
The Crown Prosecution Service describes rape as:
The elements of rape are:
(A) intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis; (B) does not consent to the penetration, and (A) does not reasonably believe that (B) consents
Penetration of the mouth is included.
This petition seeks to change this sexist and outdated definition of rape.
It closes on the 22nd of August 2017, so please sign it if you can, or share it so British followers can sign it!
Some more that didnt fit the 10 image limit
Welcome to the United Kingdom
Source unknown.
130 posts