B,,oiyifrirnd...Ouhh.. So Lovel Y...

me

The support blankie is always needed for outdoor activities

google how do i get my boyfriend to call me a dog . hwo do i get my boyfrienf to pet me. How to puppydog

Happy Wet Beast Wednesday!

˖⁺‧₊˚ -⃝⃤ ˚₊‧⁺˖

the angelic urge to enter a room and corrupt every screen, flicker every light, and implode every window just to say hello

What selfshipping is like

Mood atm

you know what? I'm gonna ignore my anxiety and post this

been procrastinating making this but "here goes nothing" as they say for some reason

worried this is obvious, or everyone has been subconsciously meaning what I fear they mean

But, it's true so...

Here's to the otherlinkers

Not just the copinglinkers

But the funlinkers

The aeslinkers

The supportlinkers

The otherlinkers who are in-between those labels

The otherlinkers who feel none of those labels can describe why they link/they link for another reason

To ALL the otherlinkers

It seems like (this could just be me, idk) in a lot positivity posts saying that otherlinkers are valid and no lesser then therians, otherkins and fictionkins, there is a switch between using the term copinglink and otherlink, as if they are synonyms. But they aren't. One is a subset of the other, which includes alot more in it's definition. If you only mean copinglink, and are excluding the rest of us linkers, then say so. And if you aren't, then be a bit more careful on your wording, please. I am losing it slightly with this, my anxious brain can't handle the fact I have no idea over where everyone stands on this, yet I want to know

Otherlinkers are extremely valid and awesome, and are no less then voluntary identities. No matter why they link, only the linker gets to decide if they are any less then, with there link types, just how polykins can have kintypes that are more important to them than others, etc.

(cw: delusion mention)

"Omg I'm soOOoOooooOooo delulu!!!!1!11"

*throws almonds at you*